Tag Archive for 'InSITE'

InSITE Partners with the New York Angels

The New York Angels is a formal organization for angel investors here in New York City to capitalize on sharing informationand resources. Most large cities across the country have a similar group. Thanks to Paul Tumpowsky (InSITE Chairman of the Board) and Bronson Lingamfelter (former InSITE Fellow) who recently connected InSITE with the New York Angels, two other InSITE fellows (Marisa Tricarico and Roy Simkhay) and I are now part of the “Future Angels Program.”

As “Future Angels” we attend and actively participate in all of the angels meetings, and so far, the learning experience has been incredible. I am particularly impressed with the organization of the meetings and I am learning the appropriate questions to ask for understanding the fundamentals of a venture in just a 30-minute meeting—the Angel’s ability to quickly zero in on the critical issues is remarkable. I attribute this partially to the informal format of the meetings: a presentation spotted with Q&A is completely practical. This eases the tension for the entrepreneur and prevents the angels from falling behind throughout the presentation. When an entrepreneur struggles to explain the revenue model clearly or convince the angels as to why their marketing campaign will drive eyes to their website, an Angel immediately jumps in with questions and won’t move on until she understands.

Collaborative forums like New York Angels is a big part of what the venture community is about; as Brian Cohen has said, angel investing can be a tough sport. By coming together, the Angels can consider several potential investments at once, and analyze them with peers to spot the successful entrepreneurs and find ways to fund promising ideas. The Angels create opportunities for themselves by forming long-term relationships with entrepreneurs who have impressive backgrounds, or intriguing ideas.

At last month’s meeting, the Angels heard more than ten pitches. Here are my thoughts on a few that I would consider most promising.

NabeWise Media helps movers find the perfect neighborhood while also providing real estate agents with tools to educate their clients—think Yelp! of the real estate market. Due to the “fair housing” laws, Real Estate agents are not allowed to quote neighborhood characteristics such as safety, demographics, trendiness and noise level to their clients. Now, NabeWise gives these brokers a tool to recommend to their clients for getting that critical information. NabeWise’ success hinges on great scalability and marketing potential. CEO Ann Baldinucci hires interns to write initial reviews of various neighborhoods (i.e.: Tribeca, Williamsburg, etc.), which serve as a jumping off point for customers to research and offer their own unique feedback. Scale exists because the interns can review 100 neighborhoods in a month (as a reference point, New York City’s five boroughs have approximately 300 neighborhoods). On the marketing front, Ann is signing subscription partnership deals with large networks of real estate brokers who have provided positive feedback.

SeatGeek is the first website to both reliably scrape data from online ticket brokers and provide price predictor technology. Co-Founder Zack Groetzinger captured the Angel’s attention, proclaiming SeatGeek to be 82% accurate in it’s forecasting. The forecast uses algorithms that plow through millions of compiled ticket transactions and aggregated factors that influence ticket prices. These algorithms give SeatGeek a current competitive advantage that keeps their product superior to all other ticket aggregators and online broker sites. SeatGeek earns revenue through relationships with secondary ticket markets and has begun signing revenue sharing deals with many content sites. SeatGeek has the potential to become the next Kayak of the ticket world and for now they have gained another customer: me.

SpyderLynk creates a “snaptag”—a company’s logo with a unique (bar) code ring—that allows the consumer to interact with a company through a new marketing channel. Using mobile devices, consumers take a picture of a snaptag, which is strategically placed in a magazine or other advertisement, and then send the picture to the sponsor company. In doing so, the consumer enters into a game, wins prizes or receives coupons—the marketing and branding possibilities are endless. SpyderLynk reminds me of stickybits, in the way that both companies are creating connections between the physical and digital worlds. SpyderLynk has created a new way to build a brand, however, its success depends on (1) signing branded companies and (2) a smart marketing campaign to educate and attract customers who want to use the posted snaptags. SpyderLynk has a few name brands signed up, but for what seems like a trial, so I do not know how strong their biz dev and marketing campaigns are. This startup may be a concept that needs further development before finding investors, but for now, the angels have remained in contact.

-This article was originally posted by InSITE here: http://insiteny.org/media/2010/04/23/insite-partners-with-the-new-york-angels/

Bookmark and Share

Incoming search terms for the article:

InSITE Spring 2010 Pitch Event

Last Friday was InSITE’s final pitch event, where the five startups that we worked with all semester presented their business to New York City based venture capitalists.  In addition to the other investors in the crowd, a panel of VCs provided feedback on the individual pitches.  The panel included Morgan Rodd of Milestone Venture Partners, Will Porteous of RRE Ventures and Jason Finger, current EIR at Bessemer Venture Partners, and their participation was genuinely appreciated.  All five pitches (and all five companies) were great and we look forward to seeing what the future brings for each of them.  A bit about each of the companies:

ProtEquity:  I lead the team of Fellows working with CEO Sam Payrovi of ProtEquity.  Sam’s product, “Home Equity Protection” or “HEP,” is a contract sold to homeowners allowing them to protect the value of their home against local market declines.  From the outset, we knew one of Sam’s biggest challenges would be to explain his very technical, complicated product in a simple yet meaningful way.  I have to give a shout out to Sam and my team of fellows, Colleen Honigsberg, Alessandro Presti, Zach Safir and Seth Goldman, who managed to do exactly that.  The whole team felt a great sense of accomplishment after Sam knocked his pitch out of the park and a panelist indicated that he wanted to speak with Sam in more detail about possibly funding his company.

Bandvest provides an online community that enables crowdfunding for bands to afford initial music recordings.  I think Bandvest is an awesome idea and I hope my friends and I have the opportunity to use it frequently to support our favorite up-and-coming artists.

Modos CEO Andrew Personette did a fantastic job presenting his customizable, easy to assemble and sustainable furniture product and accompanying social media website for customers to share their customized designs.  I think Modos will be a hit because, just think about it—how many hours did you spend searching for the perfect pieces to furnish your last apartment?

Klickable is an online video platform that allows customers to create interactive videos by imbedding links and ads within the video.  The online video industry is a crowded space, however, the recent historical growth in this market is astounding (18%+ annually).  Will Klickable surpass its older, but struggling competitors to dominate this space?  Only time will tell.

Trist founder Sunil Matthew put on the final presentation of the day.  Trist is a mobile application that enables venue owners to deliver branded and interactive location-based experiences and information to customers.  I love live events so I will be pulling for Trist to become a mainstream mobile app.

The panel feedback was invaluable to the entrepreneurs and informative for the InSITE Fellows.  I have added my thoughts to some of the feedback, which I considered to fall into three equally important categories: pitch design; must-see quantitative data; and thoughts for actually improving the business.

Pitch Design: Though not directed to the business concept itself, feedback related to pitch design is nonetheless critical.  A solid pitch signals that you are organized, thorough and invested in your business—all qualities that motivate investors.  Placing the management team slide towards the front, as opposed to the end, particularly in the case of a complicated product where the CEO has extensive domain expertise will immediately ease some of the VCs concerns.  Using examples of how similar, successful products or comparable ideas worked well under the same circumstances, also gives investors a point of reference.  Additionally, outlining your short-term milestones is crucial to a pitch.  While visions of ubiquitous use of your product is great, VCs want to know how you are going to achieve short-term milestones—while spending their cash—to actually reach your long-term goals.  Finally, if your product is entering a struggling (or crowded) market, you must address this issue head-on and demonstrate how you are “special” and superior to your competitors.

Essential Quant Data: A successful pitch will include a detailed yet coherent explanation of the revenue model.  Even in my limited experience, I have seen pitches fail because the presenter did not explain the revenue model well enough.  This usually leads to the entrepreneur spending valuable time helping the VC understand how you will make money, instead of why your business is truly awesome.  In addition, you must convince the VCs that the economics make sense for the customer, and, if you are a B2B2C business they must also make sense for the consumer.  Moreover, entrepreneurs should present an honest and thoughtful market sizing.  Convincing an investor that you have thoroughly considered why the perceived customer base would actually use your product can go a long way towards raising money.  Finally, a few classic marketing 101 concepts are necessary, such as what the customer acquisition costs are and how many orders it takes to break even.

Actual Concept Improvement: Business improvement recommendations range from truly understanding your best distribution channels and tapping them, to realizing that your idea is reliant on successful business development, which, in my mind, requires building a management team with heavy hitters from your industry.  It is also essential to understand whether your product is a fad or if it can be copied easily.  In such cases, owners should endeavor to build the business more quickly than initially imagined, which means, don’t hesitate to ask for more money!

After a successful Spring 2010 Pitch Event, we’re looking forward to Fall 2011!

Bookmark and Share

Incoming search terms for the article:




© 2010-2012 Jonathan Cooper All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright